When picking which articles to read, I’m not
going to lie, I scanned over them to see which were shorter – my mind wanders
easily… However, all of them seemed to be pretty interesting topics. The two
genres, op-ed and daily article, I think, are similar but different. One thing
they have in common (and that I like) is that they’re both fairly short.
They’re nothing like a descriptive and cited research paper – they’re concise
and to the point!
An opinion-editorial is exactly what it sounds
like. An opinion! The one that stuck out to me was “Criminal Rape Cases Should
Not Be on a Ticking Clock” by Gloria Allred, aka the editorial written because
of the all the light shined on the Bill Cosby sexual assault case stuff. What I
noticed about op-eds is that they pick an argument or stance on the topic,
elaborate on it, and try to persuade you to agree with them using evidence,
which I feel like usually works.
In the case of Allred’s article, she’s a woman
who was outraged by these rape allegations against Cosby and that it seems he’ll
get away with his disgusting crimes. Her argument:
he of course should not get away with this nor should any other rapist or
assaulter. She starts out with a little context to the Cosby case stating that
50 women accused him of sexual assaults yet only one case has been filed AND
it’s pending… She elaborates by
explaining that many of these types of cases don’t get filed for numerous
reasons, such as a victim feeling scared or ashamed. BUT, the one thing that shouldn’t be a reason for these cases to
not follow through is that it’s too late due to the statue of limitations. She persuades the audience to support the
Justice for Victims Act, a bill that would eliminate the status of limitations
on these types of cases, with evidence that is mind-boggling. (If you didn’t
read this piece, did you know that the crime of embezzlement of public funds is
exempt from a statue of limitations yet a person getting sexually assaulted is
not?! How stupid!)
Ethos in present in this article in that you get
a sense that the author really care that this act gets signed by Governor Brown
for the victims of sexual abuse in the state of California. She provides
sufficient evidence and support on why rape cases should not have a countdown
clock until the assaulter is out of the woods—logos. I mean 16 other states
have passed the act already, why can’t Gov. Brown take 2.5 seconds out of his
day to sign the bill? And finally she provokes emotions, especially for women,
that what if this were me in this situation or someone I know? The criminals
should pay for their crimes.
On the other hand, a daily article seems a little
more factual and a little less argumentative. To me, it looks like the author
is writing about the topic just to write about it and inform about it. Although
I haven’t watched Stranger Things, but
I think I should now, I read the article about it, “’Stranger Things’ and the
Psychic Nosebleed.” I thought I wasn’t going to understand anything since I don't
know the show, but that wasn't the case. It gave context of the show and talked
about a specific subject from it as also seen in other suspenseful movies,
nosebleeds. Side note: I’ve only had two nosebleeds in my life and they both
were crazy bloodbaths. I can't imagine having them all the time like these
characters! Ugghh! Anyway, this article tries to answer the question: why do
these shows and movies depict nosebleeds as related to psychic or telekinetic
powers? As mentioned in class, the question is answered and supported by
research. Is there a biological explanation? A deeper meaning related to a
woman’s menstruation cycle? Who even knows.
These genres are different from 15-page research
papers in that they don't take up a lot of your time to get the facts, hear the
argument, and make a choice to agree or disagree. You also don’t have to worry
about how many sentences are in each paragraph!
When we have to write our own article, I’m not
sure which one I’m going to pick… I wouldn’t mind sharing my opinion about a
current event, but there’s so many I don’t know what I would choose! It’s also
cool though that a daily article can be on a topic as fun as a hit TV show. We’ll
see!
-- Victoria
Given that I had a midnight deadline for a couple other assignment, I definitely searched for the shortest articles as well! However, I agree that most of them were very interesting and I'm glad that I read them all the way through. I also found Allred's article to be very interesting, and I think you did some good analysis on it. You laid out the foundation of the article and then explained why you thought it exemplified ethos, logos, and pathos. I think that article was an especially good example of pathos given how sensitive the subject is and how passionate she was about it. I'm in the same boat with you about Stranger Things. I haven't watched it, but with all I'm hearing about in this class I think I'm going to give it a shot. I purposely didn't read the article about it because I assumed that in order to understand it, I would had to have watched the show. I'm glad to know that this isn't the case, and I'll probably end up going back and reading the article so I can get a sense for what Strangers Things is all about.
ReplyDelete-Sam Spoden
Hey Victoria! I also was looking for the fastest way to finish up this assignment! But when I opened the first article I actually was interested in the topic and then read all the op-ed articles all the way through! The JSTOR articles were a little harder for me to stay focused on, but I also found them interesting. I liked how you organized your blog post and by bolding the important rules really made them stand out. The cool thing about JSTOR articles it that it can be about a TV show or something not scholarly at all. Im thinking I'll probably write an Op-ed paper so I can add my opinion on something I'm passionate about.
ReplyDeletesee you in class! -Katie Yale